Paper detail

The mass scales of the Higgs field

In the first version of the theory, with a classical scalar potential, the sector inducing SSB was distinct from the Higgs field interactions induced through its gauge and Yukawa couplings. We have adopted a similar perspective but, following most recent lattice simulations, described SSB in $λΦ^4$ theory as a weak first-order phase transition. In this case, the resulting effective potential has two mass scales: i) a lower mass $m_h$, defined by its quadratic shape at the minima, ~and~ ii) a larger mass $M_h$, defined by the zero-point energy. These refer to different momentum scales in the propagator and are related by $M^2_h\sim m^2_h \ln (Λ_s/M_h)$, where $Λ_s$ is the ultraviolet cutoff of the scalar sector. We have checked this two-scale structure with lattice simulations of the propagator and of the susceptibility in the 4D Ising limit of the theory. These indicate that, in a cutoff theory where both $m_h$ and $M_h$ are finite, by increasing the energy, there could be a transition from a relatively low value, e.g. $m_h$=125 GeV, to a much larger $M_h$. The same lattice data give a final estimate $M_h= 720 \pm 30 $ GeV which induces to re-consider the experimental situation at LHC. In particular an independent analysis of the ATLAS + CMS data indicating an excess in the 4-lepton channel as if there were a new scalar resonance around 700 GeV. Finally, the presence of two vastly different mass scales, requiring an interpolating form for the Higgs field propagator also in loop corrections, could reduce the discrepancy with those precise measurements which still favor large values of the Higgs particle mass.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.