BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Maurizio Consoli

Maurizio Consoli contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-phphysics.gen-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Experimental signals for a second resonance of the Higgs field

In the region of invariant mass 620$÷$740 GeV, we have analyzed the ATLAS sample of 4-lepton events that could indicate a new scalar resonance produced mainly via gluon-gluon fusion. These data suggest the existence of a new heavy state $H$ whose mass $660÷680$ GeV would fit well with the theoretical range $M_H = 690 \pm 10 ~({\rm stat}) \pm 20 ~({\rm sys})~ {\rm GeV}$ for the hypothetical second resonance of the Higgs field that has been recently proposed and which would couple to longitudinal W's with the same typical strength of the low-mass state at $125$ GeV. Since the total width $Γ_H$ is very poorly determined, to sharpen the analysis of the precious ATLAS data, we have considered a particular correlation between resonating peak cross section $σ_R(pp\to H \to 4l)$ and the ratio $γ_H=Γ_H/M_H$. This correlation should be nearly insensitive to the precise value of $Γ_H$ and mainly determined by the lower mass $m_h=$ 125 GeV. Equivalently, if this correlation holds true, one could also fit $m_h$ from the 4-lepton data in the high-mass range 620$÷$740 GeV. The result $(m_h)^{\rm fit} \sim (125 \pm 13)$ GeV reproduces the direct measurement of the Higgs particle mass and thus supports the idea that $m_h$ and $M_H$ are the masses of two different excitations of the same field. Therefore, if we combine with the excess at 680 GeV in the ATLAS $γγ$ distribution, there are now two signals for a new resonance in the same mass region. Even though, quantitatively, the global statistical significance of each effect is modest, still the sharp correlation $γ_H-σ_R$ in the 4-lepton channel should induce to consider seriously these indications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quantum Non-Locality and the CMB: what Experiments say

"Non-Locality is most naturally incorporated into a theory in which there is a special frame of reference. One possible candidate for this special frame of reference is the one in which the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is isotropic. However, other than the fact that a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics requires a preferred frame and the CMB provides us with one, there is no readily apparent reason why the two should be linked" (L. Hardy). Starting from this remark we first argue that, given the present view of the vacuum, the basic tenets of Quantum Field Theory cannot guarantee that Einstein Special Relativity, with no preferred frame, is the physically realized version of relativity. Then, to try to understand the nature of the hypothetical preferred $Σ-$frame, we consider the so called ether-drift experiments, those precise optical measurements that try to detect in laboratory a small angular dependence of the two-way velocity of light and then to correlate this angular dependence with the direct CMB observations with satellites in space. By considering all experiments performed so far, from Michelson-Morley to the present experiments with optical resonators, and analyzing the small observed residuals in a modern theoretical framework, the long sought $Σ-$ frame tight to the CMB naturally emerges. Finally, if quantum non-locality reflects some effect propagating at vastly superluminal speed $v_{QI} \to \infty $, its ultimate origin could be hidden somewhere in the infinitely large speed $c_s \to \infty$ of the vacuum density fluctuations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The mass scales of the Higgs field

In the first version of the theory, with a classical scalar potential, the sector inducing SSB was distinct from the Higgs field interactions induced through its gauge and Yukawa couplings. We have adopted a similar perspective but, following most recent lattice simulations, described SSB in $λΦ^4$ theory as a weak first-order phase transition. In this case, the resulting effective potential has two mass scales: i) a lower mass $m_h$, defined by its quadratic shape at the minima, ~and~ ii) a larger mass $M_h$, defined by the zero-point energy. These refer to different momentum scales in the propagator and are related by $M^2_h\sim m^2_h \ln (Λ_s/M_h)$, where $Λ_s$ is the ultraviolet cutoff of the scalar sector. We have checked this two-scale structure with lattice simulations of the propagator and of the susceptibility in the 4D Ising limit of the theory. These indicate that, in a cutoff theory where both $m_h$ and $M_h$ are finite, by increasing the energy, there could be a transition from a relatively low value, e.g. $m_h$=125 GeV, to a much larger $M_h$. The same lattice data give a final estimate $M_h= 720 \pm 30 $ GeV which induces to re-consider the experimental situation at LHC. In particular an independent analysis of the ATLAS + CMS data indicating an excess in the 4-lepton channel as if there were a new scalar resonance around 700 GeV. Finally, the presence of two vastly different mass scales, requiring an interpolating form for the Higgs field propagator also in loop corrections, could reduce the discrepancy with those precise measurements which still favor large values of the Higgs particle mass.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the low-energy spectrum of spontaneously broken Φ^4 theories

The low-energy spectrum of a one-component, spontaneously broken Φ^4 theory is generally believed to have the same simple massive form \sqrt{{\bf p}^2 + m^2_h} as in the symmetric phase where < Φ>=0. However, in lattice simulations of the 4D Ising limit of the theory, the two-point connected correlator and the connected scalar propagator show deviations from a standard massive behaviour that do not exist in the symmetric phase. As a support for this observed discrepancy, I present a variational, analytic calculation of the energy spectrum E_1({\bf p}) in the broken phase. This analytic result, while providing the trend E_1({\bf p})\sim \sqrt{{\bf p}^2 + m^2_h} at large |{\bf p}|, gives an energy gap E_1(0)< m_h, even when approaching the infinite-cutoff limit Λ\to \infty with that infinitesimal coupling λ\sim 1/\ln Λsuggested by the standard interpretation of &#34;triviality&#34; within leading-order perturbation theory. I also compare with other approaches and discuss the more general implications of the result.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access