Paper detail

The Mass-Independence of Specific Star Formation Rates in Galactic Disks

The slope of the star formation rate/stellar mass relation (the SFR "Main Sequence"; ${\rm SFR}-M_*$) is not quite unity: specific star formation rates $({\rm SFR}/M_*)$ are weakly-but-significantly anti-correlated with $M_*$. Here we demonstrate that this trend may simply reflect the well-known increase in bulge mass-fractions -- portions of a galaxy not forming stars -- with $M_*$. Using a large set of bulge/disk decompositions and SFR estimates derived from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show that re-normalizing SFR by disk stellar mass $({\rm sSFR_{\rm disk}\equiv SFR}/M_{*,{\rm disk}})$ reduces the $M_*$-dependence of SF efficiency by $\sim0.25$ dex per dex, erasing it entirely in some subsamples. Quantitatively, we find $\log {\rm sSFR_{disk}}-\log M_*$ to have a slope $β_{\rm disk}\in[-0.20,0.00]\pm0.02$ (depending on SFR estimator and Main Sequence definition) for star-forming galaxies with $M_*\geq10^{10}M_{\odot}$ and bulge mass-fractions $B/T\lesssim0.6$, generally consistent with a pure-disk control sample ($β_{\rm control}=-0.05\pm0.04$). That $\langle{\rm SFR}/M_{*,{\rm disk}}\rangle$ is (largely) independent of host mass for star-forming disks has strong implications for aspects of galaxy evolution inferred from any ${\rm SFR}-M_*$ relation, including: manifestations of "mass quenching" (bulge growth), factors shaping the star-forming stellar mass function (uniform $d\log M_*/dt$ for low-mass, disk-dominated galaxies), and diversity in star formation histories (dispersion in ${\rm SFR}(M_*,t)$). Our results emphasize the need to treat galaxies as composite systems -- not integrated masses -- in observational and theoretical work.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.