Researcher profile

Augustus Oemler

Augustus Oemler contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Matching the Evolution of the Stellar Mass Function Using Log-normal Star Formation Histories

We show that a model consisting of individual, log-normal star formation histories for a volume-limited sample of $z\approx0$ galaxies reproduces the evolution of the total and quiescent stellar mass functions at $z\lesssim2.5$ and stellar masses $M_*\geq10^{10}\,{\rm M_\odot}$. This model has previously been shown to reproduce the star formation rate/stellar mass relation (${\rm SFR}$--$M_*$) over the same interval, is fully consistent with the observed evolution of the cosmic ${\rm SFR}$ density at $z\leq8$, and entails no explicit "quenching" prescription. We interpret these results/features in the context of other models demonstrating a similar ability to reproduce the evolution of (1) the cosmic ${\rm SFR}$ density, (2) the total/quiescent stellar mass functions, and (3) the ${\rm SFR}$--$M_*$ relation, proposing that the key difference between modeling approaches is the extent to which they stress/address diversity in the (starforming) galaxy population. Finally, we suggest that observations revealing the timescale associated with dispersion in ${\rm SFR}(M_*)$ will help establish which models are the most relevant to galaxy evolution.

preprint2014arXiv

The IMACS Cluster Building Survey: V. Further Evidence for Starburst Recycling from Quantitative Galaxy Morphologies

Using $J$ and $K_s$ band imaging obtained as part of the IMACS Cluster Building Survey (ICBS) we measure Sérsic indices for 2160 field and cluster galaxies at $0.31 < z < 0.54$. Using both mass- and magnitude-limited samples, we compare the distributions for spectroscopically determined passive, continuously starforming, starburst, and poststarburst systems and show that previously established spatial and statistical connections between these types extend to their gross morphologies. Outside of cluster cores, we find close structural ties between starburst and continuously starforming, as well as poststarburst and passive types, but not between starbursts and poststarbursts. These results independently support two conclusions presented in Paper II of this ICBS series (Dressler et al.): 1) most starbursts are the product of a non-disruptive triggering mechanism that is insensitive to global environment, such as minor-mergers; 2) starbursts and poststarbursts generally represent transient phases in the lives of &#34;normal&#34; starforming and quiescent galaxies, respectively, originating from and returning to these systems in closed &#34;recycling&#34; loops. In this picture, spectroscopically identified poststarbursts constitute a minority of all recently terminated starbursts, largely ruling-out the typical starburst as a quenching event in all but the densest environments.

preprint2014arXiv

The Mass-Independence of Specific Star Formation Rates in Galactic Disks

The slope of the star formation rate/stellar mass relation (the SFR &#34;Main Sequence&#34;; ${\rm SFR}-M_*$) is not quite unity: specific star formation rates $({\rm SFR}/M_*)$ are weakly-but-significantly anti-correlated with $M_*$. Here we demonstrate that this trend may simply reflect the well-known increase in bulge mass-fractions -- portions of a galaxy not forming stars -- with $M_*$. Using a large set of bulge/disk decompositions and SFR estimates derived from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show that re-normalizing SFR by disk stellar mass $({\rm sSFR_{\rm disk}\equiv SFR}/M_{*,{\rm disk}})$ reduces the $M_*$-dependence of SF efficiency by $\sim0.25$ dex per dex, erasing it entirely in some subsamples. Quantitatively, we find $\log {\rm sSFR_{disk}}-\log M_*$ to have a slope $β_{\rm disk}\in[-0.20,0.00]\pm0.02$ (depending on SFR estimator and Main Sequence definition) for star-forming galaxies with $M_*\geq10^{10}M_{\odot}$ and bulge mass-fractions $B/T\lesssim0.6$, generally consistent with a pure-disk control sample ($β_{\rm control}=-0.05\pm0.04$). That $\langle{\rm SFR}/M_{*,{\rm disk}}\rangle$ is (largely) independent of host mass for star-forming disks has strong implications for aspects of galaxy evolution inferred from any ${\rm SFR}-M_*$ relation, including: manifestations of &#34;mass quenching&#34; (bulge growth), factors shaping the star-forming stellar mass function (uniform $d\log M_*/dt$ for low-mass, disk-dominated galaxies), and diversity in star formation histories (dispersion in ${\rm SFR}(M_*,t)$). Our results emphasize the need to treat galaxies as composite systems -- not integrated masses -- in observational and theoretical work.

preprint2013arXiv

The IMACS Cluster Building Survey: IV. The Log-normal Star Formation History of Galaxies

We present here a simple model for the star formation history of galaxies that is successful in describing both the star formation rate density over cosmic time, as well as the distribution of specific star formation rates of galaxies at the current epoch, and the evolution of this quantity in galaxy populations to a redshift of z=1. We show first that the cosmic star formation rate density is remarkably well described by a simple log-normal in time. We next postulate that this functional form for the ensemble is also a reasonable description for the star formation histories of individual galaxies. Using the measured specific star formation rates for galaxies at z~0 from Paper III in this series, we then construct a realisation of a universe populated by such galaxies in which the parameters of the log-normal star formation history of each galaxy are adjusted to match the specific star formation rates at z~0 as well as fitting, in ensemble, the cosmic star formation rate density from z=0 to z=8. This model predicts, with striking fidelity, the distribution of specific star formation rates in mass-limited galaxy samples to z=1; this match is not achieved by other models with a different functional form for the star formation histories of individual galaxies, but with the same number of degrees of freedom, suggesting that the log-normal form is well matched to the likely actual histories of individual galaxies. We also impose the specific star formation rate versus mass distributions at higher redshifts from Paper III as constraints on the model, and show that, as previously suggested, some galaxies in the field, particularly low mass galaxies, are quite young at intermediate redshifts. As emphasized in Paper III, starbursts are insufficient ...[abridged]

preprint1996arXiv

The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey

We present the $R$-band luminosity function for a sample of 18678 galaxies, with average redshift $z = 0.1$, from the Las Campanas Redshift Survey. The luminosity function may be fit by a Schechter function with $M^* = -20.29 \pm 0.02 + 5 \log h$, $α= -0.70 \pm 0.05$, and $ϕ^* = 0.019 \pm 0.001 \ h^3$~Mpc$^{-3}$, for absolute magnitudes $-23.0 \leq M - 5 \log h \leq -17.5$. We compare our luminosity function to that from other redshift surveys; in particular our normalization is consistent with that of the Stromlo-APM survey, and is therefore a factor of two below that implied by the $b_J \approx 20$ bright galaxy counts. Our normalization thus indicates that much more evolution is needed to match the faint galaxy count data, compared to minimal evolution models which normalize at $b_J \approx 20$. Also, we show that our faint-end slope $α= -0.7$, though ``shallower&#39;&#39; than typical previous values $α= -1$, results primarily from fitting the detailed shape of the LCRS luminosity function, rather than from any absence of intrinsically faint galaxies from our survey. Finally, using [OII] 3727 equivalent width $W_λ = 5$~Å\ as the dividing line, we find significant differences in the luminosity functions of emission and non-emission galaxies, particularly in their $α$ values. Emission galaxies have Schechter parameters $M^* = -20.03 \pm 0.03 + 5 \log h$ and $α= -0.9 \pm 0.1$, while non-emission galaxies are described by $M^* = -20.22 \pm 0.02 + 5 \log h$ and $α= -0.3 \pm 0.1$. (abridged abstract)