Paper detail

The Lp-Lq problems of Bergman-type operators

Let $\mathbb{B}^d$ be the unit ball on the complex space $\mathbb{C}^d$ with normalized Lebesgue measure $dv.$ For $α\in\mathbb{R},$ denote $k_α(z,w)=\frac{1}{(1-\langle z,w\rangle)^α},$ the Bergman-type integral operator $K_α$ on $L^1(\mathbb{B}^d,dv)$ is defined by $$ K_αf(z)=\int_{\mathbb{B}^d}k_α(z,w)f(w)dv(w).$$ It is an important class of operators in the holomorphic function space theory over the unit ball. We also consider the integral operator $K_α^+$ on $L^1(\mathbb{B}^d,dv)$ which is given by $$ K_α^+ f(z)=\int_{\mathbb{B}^d}\vert k_α(z,w)\vert f(w)dv(w).$$ In this paper, we completely characterize the $L^p$-$L^q$ boundedness of $K_α,K_α^+$ and $L^p$-$L^q$ compactness of $K_α.$ The results of boundedness are in fact the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev theorem but also prove the conjecture of G. Cheng et al [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2017), MR3710638 ] in the case of bounded domain $\mathbb{B}^d.$ Meanwhile, a trace formula and some sharp norm estimates of $K_α,K_α^+$ are given.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.