Paper detail

The Limits of Resolution and Dose for Aberration-Corrected Electron Tomography

Aberration-corrected electron microscopy can resolve the smallest atomic bond-lengths in nature. However, the high-convergence angles that enable spectacular resolution in 2D have unknown 3D resolution limits for all but the smallest objects ($< \sim$8nm). We show aberration-corrected electron tomography offers new limits for 3D imaging by measuring several focal planes at each specimen tilt. We present a theoretical foundation for aberration-corrected electron tomography by establishing analytic descriptions for resolution, sampling, object size, and dose---with direct analogy to the Crowther-Klug criterion. Remarkably, aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron tomography can measure complete 3D specimen structure of unbounded object sizes up to a specified cutoff resolution. This breaks the established Crowther limit when tilt increments are twice the convergence angle or smaller. Unprecedented 3D resolution is achievable across large objects. Atomic 3D imaging (1$\unicode{xC5}$) is allowed across extended objects larger than depth-of-focus (e.g. $>$ 20nm) using available microscopes and modest specimen tilting ($<$ 3$^\circ$). Furthermore, aberration-corrected tomography follows the rule of dose-fractionation where a specified total dose can be divided among tilts and defoci.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.