Paper detail

The Lie Detector

How many free variables do we really need to build a credible model of a physical system? Currently there is no systematic approach; we appeal to some physical principles, tune free variables by comparing with canonical cases, and hope our real-world applications interpolate between them. In this work we combine two pioneering and entirely disparate pieces of mathematics: the century-old techniques of Sophus Lie for solving differential equtions and recent work initiated by Field's medallist Terence Tao on converting NP-complete combinatorical problems into neighbouring convex optimisations. We present a novel and fully systematic procedure for designing models of physical systems with necessary and just-sufficient complexity, in marked contrast with the approach to function approximation taken by neural networks and other current approaches to machine learning. Our methodology replaces the ad-hoc development of models to recover structure and understanding from observational, experimental or simulated data. At its core, our method seeks to find invariant properties of differential equations known as Lie symmetries, and for this reason we have called our algorithm the Lie Detector.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.