Paper detail

The Italian Crisis and Producer Households Debt: a Source of Stability? A Reproducible Research

The European Credit Research Institute Research Report 2013 identifies Households debt "rapid increase and abrupt retrenchment" among the causes of macroeconomic instability in the European Union after 2008. In our research: i) we accessed the Bank of Italy Online Statistical Database on Customers and Risk for Producer Households and Non-Financial Corporations with R Sweave open access statistical software, which makes our analysis freely reproducible by other researchers; ii) we subset the European System of Accounts sector Households into the Bank of Italy sub-sectors Households and Producer Households, which are market producing entities limited to informal partnerships, de facto companies and sole proprietorships with up to five employees and iii) we tested the hypothesis of "rapid increase and abrupt retrenchment" of debt for this subset in Italy for the period 1996-2013. We found that PH debt (bad debt) has been more stable with a lower Variation Coefficient of 10.3% (14.2%) versus 13.2% (20.1%) in NFC. We also found that the time series of the ratio of debt granted to NFC (numerator) versus PH (denominator) is best described (Multiple Squared 0.95) by the concavity of the 5th degree coefficient (slope -1.22; 95% CI -1.52 - -0.91) of a 5th order polynomial linear regression and by the convexity of the 2nd degree coefficient (slope 4.26; 95% CI 2.53 - 5.99) for bad debt (Multiple R Squared 0.47), with this concavity of debt and convexity of bad debt beginning with the Italian crisis in the second trimester of 2008. We reject the hypothesis (p < 0.01) of "rapid increase and abrupt retrenchment" of debt for the subset Producer Households during the Italian Crisis. We generate the hypothesis that this subset could represent a prospective source of stability relative to Non-Financial Corporation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.