Paper detail

The Higgs boson inclusive decay channels $H \to b\bar{b}$ and $H \to gg$ up to four-loop level

The principle of maximum conformality (PMC) has been suggested to eliminate the renormalization scheme and renormalization scale uncertainties, which are unavoidable for the conventional scale setting and are usually important errors for theoretical estimations. In this paper, by applying PMC scale setting, we analyze two important inclusive Standard Model Higgs decay channels, $H\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $H\rightarrow gg$, up to four-loop and three-loop levels accordingly. After PMC scale setting, it is found that the conventional scale uncertainty for these two channels can be eliminated to a high degree. There is small residual initial scale dependence for the Higgs decay widths due to unknown higher-order $\{β_i\}$-terms. Up to four-loop level, we obtain $Γ(H\rightarrow b\bar{b}) = 2.389\pm0.073 \pm0.041$ MeV and up to three-loop level, we obtain $Γ(H\rightarrow gg) = 0.373\pm0.030$ MeV, where the first error is caused by varying $M_H=126\pm4$ GeV and the second error for $H\to b\bar{b}$ is caused by varying the $\overline{\rm MS}$-running mass $m_b(m_b)=4.18\pm0.03$ GeV. Taking $H\to b\bar{b}$ as an example, we present a comparison of three BLM-based scale setting approaches, e.g. the PMC-I approach based on the PMC-BLM correspondence, the $R_δ$-scheme and the seBLM approach, all of which are designed to provide effective ways to identify non-conformal $\{β_i\}$-series at each perturbative order. At four-loop level, all those approaches lead to good pQCD convergence, they have almost the same pQCD series, and their predictions are almost independent on the initial renormalization scale. In this sense, those approaches are equivalent to each other.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.