Paper detail

The heavy ions are "preheated" prior to hight energy collisions

The so called "isobar run" or RHIC was designed to compare a number of observables for collisions of $^{96}_{40}Zr$ with those of $^{96}_{44}Ru$, aimed at identification of $Z$-dependent effects. However, as the STAR data have shown with unprecedented accuracy, these two nuclides differ stronger than expected, producing effects larger than those depending on charge. So far, multiple studies tried to quantify their shape differences, in relation to various observables. General consensus is that these differences somehow should be related to nuclear structure, in particularly properties of the lowest excited states. Yet the precise connection between these fields -- low and high energy nuclear physics -- is still missing. In this paper I propose such a connection, via a concept of thermal density matrices of a "preheated" nuclei. The effective temperature should parameterize which set of excited states should be included in the calculations. I also suggest semiclassical "flucton" method at finite temperatures to be used to calculate thermal density matrices.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.