Paper detail

The $g$-areas and the commutator length

The commutator length of a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism $f\in \mathrm{Ham}(M, ω)$ of a closed symplectic manifold $(M,ω)$ is by definition the minimal $k$ such that $f$ can be written as a product of $k$ commutators in $\mathrm{Ham}(M, ω)$. We introduce a new invariant for Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms, called the $k_+$-area, which measures the "distance", in a certain sense, to the subspace $\mathcal{C}_k$ of all products of $k$ commutators. Therefore this invariant can be seen as the obstruction to writing a given Hamiltonian diffeomorphism as a product of $k$ commutators. We also consider an infinitesimal version of the commutator problem: what is the obstruction to writing a Hamiltonian vector field as a linear combination of $k$ Lie brackets of Hamiltonian vector fields? A natural problem related to this question is to describe explicitly, for every fixed $k$, the set of linear combinations of $k$ such Lie brackets. The problem can be obviously reformulated in terms of Hamiltonians and Poisson brackets. For a given Morse function $f$ on a symplectic Riemann surface $M$ (verifying a weak genericity condition) we describe the linear space of commutators of the form $\{f,g\}$, with $g\in\mathcal{C}^\infty(M,\mathbb{R})$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.