Paper detail

The Future of Traditional Fuel Vehicles (TFV) and New Energy Vehicles (NEV): Creative Destruction or Co-existence?

There is a rapid development and commercialization of new Energy Vehicles (NEV) in recent years. Although traditional fuel vehicles (TFV) still occupy a majority share of the market, it is generally believed that NEV is more efficient, more environmental friendly, and has a greater potential of a Schumpeterian "creative destruction" that may lead to a paradigm shift in auto production and consumption. However, less is discussed regarding the potential environmental impact of NEV production and future uncertainty in R&D bottleneck of NEV technology and innovation. This paper aims to propose a modelling framework based on Lux (1995) that investigates the long-term dynamics of TFV and NEV, along with their associated environmental externality. We argue that environmental and technological policies will play a critical role in determining its future development. It is of vital importance to constantly monitor the potential environmental impact of both sectors and support the R&D of critical NEV technology, as well as curbing its negative externality in a preemptive manner.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.