Paper detail

The Formation History of Subhalos and the Evolution of Satellite Galaxies

Satellites constitute an important fraction of the overall galaxy population and are believed to form in dark matter subhalos. Here we use the cosmological hydrodynamic simulation TNG100 to investigate how the formation histories of subhalos affect the properties and evolution of their host galaxies. We use a scaled formation time ($a_{\rm nf}$) to characterize the mass assembly histories of the subhalos before they are accreted by massive host halos. We find that satellite galaxies in young subhalos (low $a_{\rm nf}$) are less massive and more gas rich, and have stronger star formation and a higher fraction of ex situ stellar mass than satellites in old subhalos (high $a_{\rm nf}$). Furthermore, these low $a_{\rm nf}$ satellites require longer timescales to be quenched as a population than the high $a_{\rm nf}$ counterparts. We find very different merger histories between satellites in fast accretion (FA, $a_{\rm nf}<1.3$) and slow accretion (SA, $a_{\rm nf}>1.3$) subhalos. For FA satellites, the galaxy merger frequency dramatically increases just after accretion, which enhances the star formation at accretion. While, for SA satellites, the mergers occur smoothly and continuously across the accretion time. Moreover, mergers with FA satellites happen mainly after accretion, while a contrary trend is found for SA satellites. Our results provide insight into the evolution and star formation quenching of the satellite population.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.