Paper detail

The flavor changing top decay t-->c+sneutrino or sneutrino-->t+c(bar) in the MSSM without R-parity

Widths for the new flavor changing top quark decay t-->c+sneutrino or for the reversed sneutrino decay sneutrino-->t+c(bar) are calculated in the MSSM without R-parity conservation. For large \tanβ, e.g., \tanβ~ m_t/m_b ~ 40, Br(t-->c+sneutrino) > 10^{-5} or Br(sneutrino-->t+c(bar)) > 10^{-6} in a relatively wide range of the supersymmetric parameter space as long as there is more than one non-zero R-parity violating coupling. In the best cases, with a typical squark mass around 100 GeV, we find that Br(t-->c+sneutrino) ~ 10^{-4} - 10^{-3} or Br(sneutrino-->t+c(bar)) ~ 10^{-5} - 10^{-4}. For \tanβ~ O(1) the corresponding branching ratios for both top or sneutrino decays are too small to be measured at the LHC. Therefore, the decays t-->c+sneutrino or sneutrino-->t+c(bar) appear to be sensitive to \tanβand may be detected at the LHC. The branching ratios of the corresponding decays to an up quark instead of a charm quark, e.g., t-->u+sneutrino or sneutrino-->t+u(bar), may also be similar.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.