Paper detail

The explicit probability distribution of the sum of two telegraph processes

We consider two independent Goldstein-Kac telegraph processes $X_1(t)$ and $X_2(t)$ on the real line $\Bbb R$, both developing with finite constant speed $c>0$, that, at the initial time instant $t=0$, simultaneously start from the origin $0\in\Bbb R$ and whose evolutions are controlled by two independent homogeneous Poisson processes of the same rate $λ>0$. Closed-form expressions for the transition density $p(x,t)$ and the probability distribution function $Φ(x,t)=\text{Pr} \{ S(t)<x \}, \; x\in\Bbb R, \; t>0,$ of the sum $S(t)=X_1(t)+X_2(t)$ of these processes at arbitrary time instant $t>0$, are obtained. It is also proved that the shifted time derivative $g(x,t)=(\partial/\partial t+2λ)p(x,t)$ satisfies the Goldstein-Kac telegraph equation with doubled parameters $2c$ and $2λ$. From this fact it follows that $p(x,t)$ solves a third-order hyperbolic partial differential equation, but is not its fundamental solution. The general case is also discussed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.