Paper detail

The Equivalence of the Lagrangian-Averaged Navier-Stokes-α Model and the Rational LES model in Two Dimensions

In the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) framework for modeling a turbulent flow, when the large scale velocity field is defined by low-pass filtering the full velocity field, a Taylor series expansion of the full velocity field in terms of the large scale velocity field leads (at the leading order) to the nonlinear gradient model for the subfilter stresses. Motivated by the fact that while the nonlinear gradient model shows excellent a priori agreement in resolved simulations, the use of this model by itself is problematic, we consider two models that are related, but better behaved: The Rational LES model that uses a sub-diagonal Pade approximation instead of a Taylor series expansion and the Lagrangian Averaged Navier-Stokes-α model that uses a regulariza- tion approach to modeling turbulence. In this article, we show that these two latter models are identical in two dimensions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.