Paper detail

The enigmatic pair of dwarf galaxies Leo IV and Leo V: coincidence or common origin?

We have obtained deep photometry in two 1x1 degree fields covering the close pair of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSph) Leo IV and Leo V and part of the area in between. We find that both systems are significantly larger than indicated by previous measurements based on shallower data and also significantly elongated. With half-light radii of r_h=4'.6 +- 0'.8 (206 +- 36 pc) and r_h=2'.6 +- 0'.6 (133 +- 31 pc), respectively, they are now well within the physical size bracket of typical Milky Way dSph satellites. Their ellipticities of epsilon ~0.5 are shared by many faint (M_V>-8) Milky Way dSphs. The large spatial extent of our survey allows us to search for extra-tidal features with unprecedented sensitivity. The spatial distribution of candidate red giant branch and horizontal branch stars is found to be non-uniform at the ~3 sigma level. This substructure is aligned along the direction connecting the two systems, indicative of a possible `bridge' of extra-tidal material. Fitting the stellar distribution with a linear Gaussian model yields a significance of 4 sigma for this overdensity, a most likely FWHM of ~16 arcmin and a central surface brightness of ~32 mag arcsec^{-2}. We investigate different scenarios to explain the close proximity of Leo IV and Leo V and the possible tidal bridge between them. Orbit calculations demonstrate that they are unlikely to be remnants of a single disrupted progenitor, while a comparison with cosmological simulations shows that a chance collision between unrelated subhalos is negligibly small. Leo IV and Leo V could, however, be a bound `tumbling pair' if their combined mass exceeds 8 +- 4 x 10^9 M_sun. The scenario of an internally interacting pair appears to be the most viable explanation for this close celestial companionship. (abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.