Researcher profile

Kester W. Smith

Kester W. Smith contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

Classification of field dwarfs and giants in RAVE and its use in stellar stream detection

An efficient separation between dwarfs and giants in surveys of bright stars is important, especially for studies in which distances are estimated through photometric parallax relations. We use the available spectroscopic log g estimates from the second RAVE data release (DR2) to assign each star a probability for being a dwarf or subgiant/giant based on mixture model fits to the log g distribution in different color bins. We further attempt to use these stars as a labeled training set in order to classify stars which lack log g estimates into dwarfs and giants with a SVM algorithm. We assess the performance of this classification against different choices of the input feature vector. In particular, we use different combinations of reduced proper motions, 2MASS JHK, DENIS IJK and USNO-B B2R2 apparent magnitudes. Our study shows that -- for our color ranges -- the infrared bands alone provide no relevant information to separate dwarfs and giants. Even when optical bands and reduced proper motions are added, the fraction of true giants classified as dwarfs (the contamination) remains above 20%. Using only the dwarfs with available spectroscopic log g and distance estimates (the latter from Breddels et al. 2010), we then repeat the stream search by Klement, Fuchs & Rix (2008, KFR08), which assumed all stars were dwarfs and claimed the discovery of a new stellar stream at V = -160 km/s in a sample of 7015 stars from RAVE DR1. Our re-analysis of the pure DR2 dwarf sample exhibits an overdensity of 5 stars at the phase-space position of the KFR08 stream, with a metallicity distribution that appears inconsistent with that of stars at comparably low rotational velocities. Compared to several smooth Milky Way models, the mean standardized deviation of the KFR08 stream is only marginal at 1.6$\pm$0.4... (abbreviated)

preprint2010arXiv

Photometric identification of blue horizontal branch stars

We investigate the performance of some common machine learning techniques in identifying BHB stars from photometric data. To train the machine learning algorithms, we use previously published spectroscopic identifications of BHB stars from SDSS data. We investigate the performance of three different techniques, namely k nearest neighbour classification, kernel density estimation and a support vector machine (SVM). We discuss the performance of the methods in terms of both completeness and contamination. We discuss the prospect of trading off these values, achieving lower contamination at the expense of lower completeness, by adjusting probability thresholds for the classification. We also discuss the role of prior probabilities in the classification performance, and we assess via simulations the reliability of the dataset used for training. Overall it seems that no-prior gives the best completeness, but adopting a prior lowers the contamination. We find that the SVM generally delivers the lowest contamination for a given level of completeness, and so is our method of choice. Finally, we classify a large sample of SDSS DR7 photometry using the SVM trained on the spectroscopic sample. We identify 27,074 probable BHB stars out of a sample of 294,652 stars. We derive photometric parallaxes and demonstrate that our results are reasonable by comparing to known distances for a selection of globular clusters. We attach our classifications, including probabilities, as an electronic table, so that they can be used either directly as a BHB star catalogue, or as priors to a spectroscopic or other classification method. We also provide our final models so that they can be directly applied to new data.

preprint2010arXiv

The enigmatic pair of dwarf galaxies Leo IV and Leo V: coincidence or common origin?

We have obtained deep photometry in two 1x1 degree fields covering the close pair of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSph) Leo IV and Leo V and part of the area in between. We find that both systems are significantly larger than indicated by previous measurements based on shallower data and also significantly elongated. With half-light radii of r_h=4'.6 +- 0'.8 (206 +- 36 pc) and r_h=2'.6 +- 0'.6 (133 +- 31 pc), respectively, they are now well within the physical size bracket of typical Milky Way dSph satellites. Their ellipticities of epsilon ~0.5 are shared by many faint (M_V>-8) Milky Way dSphs. The large spatial extent of our survey allows us to search for extra-tidal features with unprecedented sensitivity. The spatial distribution of candidate red giant branch and horizontal branch stars is found to be non-uniform at the ~3 sigma level. This substructure is aligned along the direction connecting the two systems, indicative of a possible `bridge' of extra-tidal material. Fitting the stellar distribution with a linear Gaussian model yields a significance of 4 sigma for this overdensity, a most likely FWHM of ~16 arcmin and a central surface brightness of ~32 mag arcsec^{-2}. We investigate different scenarios to explain the close proximity of Leo IV and Leo V and the possible tidal bridge between them. Orbit calculations demonstrate that they are unlikely to be remnants of a single disrupted progenitor, while a comparison with cosmological simulations shows that a chance collision between unrelated subhalos is negligibly small. Leo IV and Leo V could, however, be a bound `tumbling pair' if their combined mass exceeds 8 +- 4 x 10^9 M_sun. The scenario of an internally interacting pair appears to be the most viable explanation for this close celestial companionship. (abridged)