Paper detail

The Enhancon, Multimonopoles and Fuzzy Geometry

The presentation at Strings 2000 was intended to be in two main parts, but there was only time for part one. However both parts appeared on the online proceedings, and are also included in this document. The first part concerns an exploration of the connection between the physics of the `enhancon' geometry arising from wrapping N D6-branes on the K3 manifold in Type IIA string theory and that of a charge N BPS multi-monopole. This also relates to the physics of 2+1 dimensional SU(N) gauge theory with eight supercharges. The main results uncovered by this exploration are: a) better insight into the non-perturbative geometry of the enhancon; b) the structure of the moduli space geometry, and its characterisation in terms of generalisations of an Atiyah-Hitchin-like manifold; c) the use of Nahm data to describe aspects of the geometry, showing that the enhancon locus itself has a description as a fuzzy sphere. Part two discusses the addition of extra D2-branes into the geometry. Two probe computations show the difference between the geometry as seen by D2-branes and that seen by wrapped D6-branes, and the accompanying gauge theory interpretations are discussed.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.