Paper detail

The efficiency and the demagnetization field of a general Halbach cylinder

The maximum magnetic efficiency of a general multipole Halbach cylinder of order $p$ is found as function of $p$. The efficiency is shown to decrease for increasing absolute value of $p$. The optimal ratio between the inner and outer radius, i.e. the ratio resulting in the most efficient design, is also found as function of $p$ and is shown to tend towards smaller and smaller magnet sizes. Finally, the demagnetizing field in a general $p$-Halbach cylinder is calculated, and it is shown that demagnetization is largest either at $\cos 2pϕ=1$ or $\cos 2pϕ=-1$. For the common case of a $p=1$ Halbach cylinder the maximum values of the demagnetizing field is either at $ϕ= 0,π$ at the outer radius, where the field is always equal to the remanence, or at $ϕ= \pm π/2$ at the inner radius, where it is the magnitude of the field in the bore. Thus to avoid demagnetization the coercivity of the magnets must be larger than these values.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.