Paper detail

The Effective Sample Size in Bayesian Information Criterion for Level-Specific Fixed and Random Effects Selection in a Two-Level Nested Model

Popular statistical software provides Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for multilevel models or linear mixed models. However, it has been observed that the combination of statistical literature and software documentation has led to discrepancies in the formulas of the BIC and uncertainties of the proper use of the BIC in selecting a multilevel model with respect to level-specific fixed and random effects. These discrepancies and uncertainties result from different specifications of sample size in the BIC's penalty term for multilevel models. In this study, we derive the BIC's penalty term for level-specific fixed and random effect selection in a two-level nested design. In this new version of BIC, called BIC_E, this penalty term is decomposed into two parts if the random effect variance-covariance matrix has full rank: (a) a term with the log of average sample size per cluster whose multiplier involves the overlapping number of dimensions between the column spaces of the random and fixed effect design matrices and (b) the total number of parameters times the log of the total number of clusters. Furthermore, we study the behavior of BIC_E in the presence of redundant random effects. The use of BIC_E is illustrated with a textbook example data set and a numerical demonstration shows that the derived formulae adheres to empirical values.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.