Paper detail

The Effect of Star Spots on Accurate Radius Determination of the Low Mass Double-lined Eclipsing Binary GU Boo

GU Boo is one of only a relatively small number of well studied double-lined eclipsing binaries that contain low-mass stars. L'opez-Morales & Ribas (2005, hereafter LR05) present a comprehensive analysis of multi-color light and radial velocity curves for this system. The GU Boo light curves presented in LR05 had substantial asymmetries, which were attributed to large spots. In spite of the asymmetry LR05 derived masses and radii accurate to about 2%. We obtained additional photometry of GU Boo using both a CCD and a single-channel photometer and modeled the light curves with the ELC software to determine if the large spots in the light curves give rise to systematic errors at the few percent level. We also modeled the original light curves from LR05 using models with and without spots. We derived a radius of the primary of 0.6329 +- 0.0026 Solar-Radii, 0.6413 +- 0.0049 SR, and 0.6373 +- 0.0029 SR from the CCD, photoelectric, and LR05 data, respectively. Each of these measurements agrees with the value reported by LR05 (R1=0.623 +- 0.016 SR) at the level of about 2%. In addition, the spread in these values is about 1-2% from the mean. For the secondary, we derive radii of 0.6074 +- 0.0035 SR, 0.5944 +- 0.0069 SR, and 0.5976 +- 0.0059 SR from the three respective data sets. The LR05 value is R2=0.620 +- 0.020 SR, which is about 2-3% larger than each of the three values we found. The spread in these values is about 2% from the mean. The systematic difference between our three determinations of the secondary radius and that of LR05 might be attributed to differences in the modelling process and codes used. Our own fits suggest that, for GU Boo at least, using accurate spot modelling of a single set of multicolor light curves results in radii determinations accurate at the 2% level.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.