Source author record

G. Windmiller

G. Windmiller appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

The architecture of the hierarchical triple star KOI 928 from eclipse timing variations seen in Kepler photometry

We present a hierarchical triple star system (KIC 9140402) where a low mass eclipsing binary orbits a more massive third star. The orbital period of the binary (4.98829 Days) is determined by the eclipse times seen in photometry from NASA's Kepler spacecraft. The periodically changing tidal field, due to the eccentric orbit of the binary about the tertiary, causes a change in the orbital period of the binary. The resulting eclipse timing variations provide insight into the dynamics and architecture of this system and allow the inference of the total mass of the binary ($0.424 \pm 0.017 \text{M}_\odot$) and the orbital parameters of the binary about the central star.

preprint2010arXiv

The Effect of Star Spots on Accurate Radius Determination of the Low Mass Double-lined Eclipsing Binary GU Boo

GU Boo is one of only a relatively small number of well studied double-lined eclipsing binaries that contain low-mass stars. L'opez-Morales & Ribas (2005, hereafter LR05) present a comprehensive analysis of multi-color light and radial velocity curves for this system. The GU Boo light curves presented in LR05 had substantial asymmetries, which were attributed to large spots. In spite of the asymmetry LR05 derived masses and radii accurate to about 2%. We obtained additional photometry of GU Boo using both a CCD and a single-channel photometer and modeled the light curves with the ELC software to determine if the large spots in the light curves give rise to systematic errors at the few percent level. We also modeled the original light curves from LR05 using models with and without spots. We derived a radius of the primary of 0.6329 +- 0.0026 Solar-Radii, 0.6413 +- 0.0049 SR, and 0.6373 +- 0.0029 SR from the CCD, photoelectric, and LR05 data, respectively. Each of these measurements agrees with the value reported by LR05 (R1=0.623 +- 0.016 SR) at the level of about 2%. In addition, the spread in these values is about 1-2% from the mean. For the secondary, we derive radii of 0.6074 +- 0.0035 SR, 0.5944 +- 0.0069 SR, and 0.5976 +- 0.0059 SR from the three respective data sets. The LR05 value is R2=0.620 +- 0.020 SR, which is about 2-3% larger than each of the three values we found. The spread in these values is about 2% from the mean. The systematic difference between our three determinations of the secondary radius and that of LR05 might be attributed to differences in the modelling process and codes used. Our own fits suggest that, for GU Boo at least, using accurate spot modelling of a single set of multicolor light curves results in radii determinations accurate at the 2% level.