Paper detail

The Effect of Non-Local Electrical Conductivity on Near-Field Radiative Heat Transfer between Graphene Sheets

Graphene's near-field radiative heat transfer is determined from its electrical conductivity, commonly modeled using the local Kubo and Drude formulas. In this letter, we analyze the non-locality of graphene's electrical conductivity using the Lindhard model combined with the Mermin relaxation time approximation. We also study how the variation of electrical conductivity with wavevector affects near-field radiative conductance between two graphene sheets separated by a vacuum gap. It is shown that the variation of electrical conductivity with wavevector, $k_ρ$, is appreciable for $k_ρ$s greater than $100k_0$, where $k_0$ is the magnitude of the wavevector in the free space. The Kubo electrical conductivity provides an accurate estimation of the spectral radiative conductance between two graphene sheets except for around the surface-plasmon-polariton frequency of graphene and at separation gaps smaller than 20 nm where there is a non-negligible contribution from modes with $k_ρ>100k_0$ to the radiative conductance. The Drude formula proves to be inaccurate for modeling the electrical conductivity and radiative conductance of graphene except for at temperatures much below the Fermi temperature and frequencies much smaller than $2μ_c/{\hbar}$, where $μ_c$ and ${\hbar}$ are the chemical potential and reduced Planck's constant, respectively. It is also shown that the electronic scattering processes should be considered in the Lindhard model properly, such that the local electron number is conserved. A substitution of $ω$ by $ω+iγ$ ($ω$, $i$, and $γ$ being the angular frequency, imaginary unit, and scattering rate, respectively) in the collisionless Lindhard model does not satisfy the conservation of the local electron number and results in significant errors in computing graphene's electrical conductivity and radiative conductance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.