Abstract
Twenty seven years after the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity \cite{BedMu}, consensus on its theoretical explanation is still absent. To a good extent, this is due to the difficulty of studying strongly correlated systems near half-filling, needed to understand the behaviour of one or few holes doped into a CuO layer. To simplify this task it is customary to replace three-band models \cite{Emery} describing the doping holes as entering the O orbitals of these charge-transfer insulators \cite{ZSA} with much simpler one-band Hubbard or models \cite{rev1,rev2}. Here we challenge this approach, showing that not only is the dynamics of a doped hole easier to understand in models that explicitly include the O orbitals, but also that our solution contradicts the long-held belief that the quantum spin fluctuations of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) background play a key role in determining this dynamics. Indeed, we show that the correct, experimentally observed dispersion is generically obtained for a hole moving on the O sublattice, and coupled to a Néel lattice of spins without spin fluctuations. This marks a significant conceptual change in our understanding of the relevant phenomenology and opens the way to studying few-holes dynamics without finite-size effect issues \cite{BayoB}, to understand the actual strength of the "magnetic glue".
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.