Paper detail

The dynamic conductivity and the plasmon profile of Aluminum in the ultra-fast-matter regime; an analysis of recent X-ray scattering data from the LCLS

We use an explicitly isochoric two-temperature theory where the ion temperature is not assumed to be equal to the electron temperature, to analyze recent X-ray laser scattering data for Aluminum in the ultra-fast-matter (UFM) regime up to 6 eV, obtained at the Standford Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS). The observed surprisingly low conductivities are explained by including strong electron-ion scattering effects using the phase shifts calculated via the density-functional neutral-pseudo-atom model (NPA). The applicability of the Mermin model to UFM is questioned. The static and dynamic conductivity, complex collision frequency and the plasmon line-shape are evaluated within a Born approximation and without the use of the Mermin response. This approach, where all needed quantities are obtained from the NPA model, provides good agreement with the reported experimental results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.