Paper detail

The double radiative $\bar{B}\to X_sγγ$ decay at $O(α_{s})$ in QCD

In these proceedings, we briefly review the individual interference contribution of the electromagnetic dipole operator $\mathcal{O}_{7}$ to the double differential decay width $dΓ_{77}/(ds_1\, ds_2)$ for the process $\bar{B} \to X_s γγ$ at $O(α_s)$ in QCD, which is based on our previous work. We define two kinematical variables $s_1$ and $s_2$ as $s_i=(p_b - q_i)^2/m_b^2$, where $p_b$, $q_1$, $q_2$ are the momenta of b-quark and two photons. While the (renormalized) virtual corrections are worked out exactly for a certain range of $s_1$ and $s_2$, we retained in the gluon bremsstrahlung process only the leading power w.r.t. the (normalized) hadronic mass $s_3=(p_b-q_1-q_2)^2/m_b^2$ in the underlying triple differential decay width $dΓ_{77}/(ds_1 ds_2 ds_3)$. We found that the double differential decay width, based on this approximation, is free of infrared- and collinear singularities when summing up the virtual- and real-radiation corrections, while this was not the case when keeping all powers in $s_3$ in the gluon bremsstrahlung process due to the configurations allowing collinear photon emission from the (massless) $s$-quark. Lastly, we compare our analytical results with those obtained in a recently extended work, where a non-zero strange quark mass was introduced to regulate the collinear photon configurations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.