Paper detail

The doping and disorder dependent variation of the isotope exponent in hole doped cuprates: A non-superconducting perspective

Since the early days of the discovery of hole doped high-Tc cuprates, the variation of the oxygen isotope exponent (IE) with the number of doped holes, p, in the CuO2 planes has been a source of considerable debate. There is a growing acceptance in the high-Tc community that the mediating bosons leading to Cooper pairing have largely electronic character. At the same time there is an increasing acknowledgement that at some level the lattice-charge interactions might be important in cuprates. The experimentally observed substantially large IE over certain doping range always casts a shadow over any proposal where non-phononic mechanism is invoked. Besides, the various existing theoretical schemes, based on electron-phonon interactions, cannot describe the anomalous features shown by the IE as a function of hole concentration/disorder, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Based on a recent experiment relating the possibility of Fermi-surface reconstruction to the thermoelectric transport measurements (Nature Commun. 2:432 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1440 (2011)), we propose here a simple scenario where isotope substitutions affect the charge/spin stripe state via the coupling to the underlying lattice and thereby change the superconducting Tc. In this picture, significant part of the IE, over an extended p-range, actually originates from the isotope induced stripe modulation and is not directly related to the characteristic energy scale of the pairing phonons as is the case in conventional BCS theory. Our proposal qualitatively explains all the disorder- and p-dependent features of the IE seen in hole doped high-Tc cuprates. We also provide with an outline of some experiments that can verify the degree of validity of the proposed scenario.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.