Paper detail

The crystal structure of FeSe0.44Te0.56

The crystal structure of the superconductor FeSe0.44Te0.56 was redetermined by high-resolution X-ray single crystal diffraction at 173 K (anti-PbO-type, P4/nmm, a=3.7996(2), c=5.9895(6) A, R1=0.022, wR2=0.041, 173 F^2). Significantly different z-coordinates of tellurium and selenium at the 2c site are clearly discernible and were refined to z_Te=0.2868(3) and z_Se=0.2468(7). Thus the chalcogen heights differ by 0.24 A and the Fe-Se bonds are by 0.154 A shorter than the Fe-Te bonds, while three independent (Te,Se)-Fe-(Te,Se) bond angles occur. An elevated U33 displacement parameter of the iron atom is suggestive of a slightly puckered Fe layer resulting from different combinations of Se or Te neighbors. Such strong disorder underlines the robustness of superconductivity against structural randomness and has not yet been considered in theoretical studies of this system.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.