Paper detail

The critical behavior of Hegselmann-Krause opinion model with smart agents

The Hegselmann-Krause (HK) model allows one to characterize the continuous change of agents' opinions with the bounded confidence threshold $\varepsilon$. To consider the heterogeneity of agents in characteristics, we study the HK model on homogeneous and heterogeneous networks by introducing a kind of smart agent. Different from the averaging rule in opinion update of HK model, smart agents will consider, in updating their opinions, the environmental influence following the fact that an agent's behavior is often coupled with environmental changes. The environment is characterized by a parameter that represents the biased resource allocation between different cliques. We focus on the critical behavior of the underlying system. A phase transition point separating a complete consensus from the coexistence of different opinions is identified, which occurs at a critical value $\varepsilon_c$ for the bounded confidence threshold. We state analytically that $\varepsilon_c$ can take only one of two possible values, depending on the behavior of the average degree $k_a$ of a social graph, when agents are homogeneous in characteristics. Results also suggest that the phase transition point weakly depends on the network structure but is strongly correlated with the fraction of smart agents and the environmental parameter. We finally establish the finite size scaling law that stresses the role that the system size has in the underlying opinion dynamics. Meanwhile, introducing smart agents does not change the functional dependence between the time to reach a complete consensus and the system size. However, it can drive a complete consensus to be reached faster, for homogeneous networks that are far from the mean field limit.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.