Paper detail

The Criterion for Chaos in Three-Planet Systems

We establish the criterion for chaos in three-planet systems, for systems similar to those discovered by the Kepler spacecraft. Our main results are as follows: (i) The simplest criterion, which is based on overlapping mean motion resonances MMR's), only agrees with numerical simulations at a very crude level. (ii) Much greater accuracy is attained by considering neighboring MMR's that do not overlap. We work out the width of the chaotic zones around each of the neighbors, and also provide simple approximate expressions for the widths. (iii) Even greater accuracy is provided by the overlap of three-body resonances (3BR's), which accounts for fine-grained structure seen in maps from N-body simulations, and also predicts the Lyapunov times. Previous studies conflict on whether overlap of MMR's or of 3BR's drive interplanetary chaos. We show that both do, and in fact they are merely different ways of looking at the same effect. (iv) We compare both criteria with high-resolution maps of chaos from N-body simulations, and show that they agree at a high level of detail.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.