Paper detail

The consequences of dependence between the formal area efficiency and the macroscopic electric field on linearity behavior in Fowler-Nordheim plots

This work presents a theoretical explanation for a crossover in the linear behavior in Fowler-Nordheim (FN) plots based on cold field electron emission (CFE) experimental data. It is characterized by a clear change in the decay rate of usually single-slope FN plots, and has been reported when non-uniform nano-emitters are subject to high macroscopic electric field $F_M$. We assume that the number of emitting spots, which defines an apparent formal area efficiency of CFE surfaces, depends on the macroscopic electric field. Non-uniformity is described by local enhancement factors $\left\{γ_j\right\}$, which are randomly assigned to each distinct emitter of a conducting CFE surface, from a discrete probability distribution $ρ{(γ_{j})}$, with $j=1,2$. It is assumed that $ρ{(γ_{1})} < ρ{(γ_{2})}$, and that $γ_{1} > γ_{2}$. The local current density is evaluated by considering a usual Schottky-Nordheim barrier. The results reproduce the two distinct slope regimes in FN plots when $F_M \in $ $[2,20]$ V/$μ$m and are analyzed by taking into account the apparent formal area efficiency, the distribution $ρ$, and the slopes in the corresponding FN plot. Finally, we remark that our results from numerical solution of Laplace's equation, for an array of conducting nano-emitters with uniform apex radii $50$ nm but different local height, supports our theoretical assumptions and could used in orthodox CFE experiments to test our predictions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.