Paper detail

The complexity of finite-valued CSPs

We study the computational complexity of exact minimisation of rational-valued discrete functions. Let $Γ$ be a set of rational-valued functions on a fixed finite domain; such a set is called a finite-valued constraint language. The valued constraint satisfaction problem, $\operatorname{VCSP}(Γ)$, is the problem of minimising a function given as a sum of functions from $Γ$. We establish a dichotomy theorem with respect to exact solvability for all finite-valued constraint languages defined on domains of arbitrary finite size. We show that every constraint language $Γ$ either admits a binary symmetric fractional polymorphism in which case the basic linear programming relaxation solves any instance of $\operatorname{VCSP}(Γ)$ exactly, or $Γ$ satisfies a simple hardness condition that allows for a polynomial-time reduction from Max-Cut to $\operatorname{VCSP}(Γ)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.