BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Stanislav Zivny

Stanislav Zivny appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsData Structures and AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

21works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

21 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

QCSP on Reflexive Tournaments

We give a complexity dichotomy for the Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem QCSP(H) when H is a reflexive tournament. It is well-known that reflexive tournaments can be split into a sequence of strongly connected components H_1,...,H_n so that there exists an edge from every vertex of H_i to every vertex of H_j if and only if i<j. We prove that if H has both its initial and final strongly connected component (possibly equal) of size 1, then QCSP(H) is in NL and otherwise QCSP(H) is NP-hard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The complexity of general-valued CSPs seen from the other side

The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is concerned with homomorphisms between two structures. For CSPs with restricted left-hand side structures, the results of Dalmau, Kolaitis, and Vardi [CP'02], Grohe [FOCS'03/JACM'07], and Atserias, Bulatov, and Dalmau [ICALP'07] establish the precise borderline of polynomial-time solvability (subject to complexity-theoretic assumptions) and of solvability by bounded-consistency algorithms (unconditionally) as bounded treewidth modulo homomorphic equivalence. The general-valued constraint satisfaction problem (VCSP) is a generalisation of the CSP concerned with homomorphisms between two valued structures. For VCSPs with restricted left-hand side valued structures, we establish the precise borderline of polynomial-time solvability (subject to complexity-theoretic assumptions) and of solvability by the $k$-th level of the Sherali-Adams LP hierarchy (unconditionally). We also obtain results on related problems concerned with finding a solution and recognising the tractable cases; the latter has an application in database theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Approximate counting CSP seen from the other side

In this paper we study the complexity of counting Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) of the form #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-), in which the goal is, given a relational structure $\mathbf{A}$ from a class $\mathcal{C}$ of structures and an arbitrary structure $\mathbf{B}$, to find the number of homomorphisms from $\mathbf{A}$ to $\mathbf{B}$. Flum and Grohe showed that #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-) is solvable in polynomial time if $\mathcal{C}$ has bounded treewidth [FOCS'02]. Building on the work of Grohe [JACM'07] on decision CSPs, Dalmau and Jonsson then showed that, if $\mathcal{C}$ is a recursively enumerable class of relational structures of bounded arity, then assuming FPT $\neq$ #W[1], there are no other cases of #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-) solvable exactly in polynomial time (or even fixed-parameter time) [TCS'04]. We show that, assuming FPT $\neq$ W[1] (under randomised parametrised reductions) and for $\mathcal{C}$ satisfying certain general conditions, #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-) is not solvable even approximately for $\mathcal{C}$ of unbounded treewidth; that is, there is no fixed parameter tractable (and thus also not fully polynomial) randomised approximation scheme for #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-). In particular, our condition generalises the case when $\mathcal{C}$ is closed under taking minors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Point-width and Max-CSPs

The complexity of (unbounded-arity) Max-CSPs under structural restrictions is poorly understood. The two most general hypergraph properties known to ensure tractability of Max-CSPs, $β$-acyclicity and bounded (incidence) MIM-width, are incomparable and lead to very different algorithms. We introduce the framework of point decompositions for hypergraphs and use it to derive a new sufficient condition for the tractability of (structurally restricted) Max-CSPs, which generalises both bounded MIM-width and \b{eta}-acyclicity. On the way, we give a new characterisation of bounded MIM-width and discuss other hypergraph properties which are relevant to the complexity of Max-CSPs, such as $β$-hypertreewidth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Complexity of Approximately Counting Retractions

Let $G$ be a graph that contains an induced subgraph $H$. A retraction from $G$ to $H$ is a homomorphism from $G$ to $H$ that is the identity function on $H$. Retractions are very well-studied: Given $H$, the complexity of deciding whether there is a retraction from an input graph $G$ to $H$ is completely classified, in the sense that it is known for which $H$ this problem is tractable (assuming $\mathrm{P}\neq \mathrm{NP}$). Similarly, the complexity of (exactly) counting retractions from $G$ to $H$ is classified (assuming $\mathrm{FP}\neq \#\mathrm{P}$). However, almost nothing is known about approximately counting retractions. Our first contribution is to give a complete trichotomy for approximately counting retractions to graphs of girth at least $5$. Our second contribution is to locate the retraction counting problem for each $H$ in the complexity landscape of related approximate counting problems. Interestingly, our results are in contrast to the situation in the exact counting context. We show that the problem of approximately counting retractions is separated both from the problem of approximately counting homomorphisms and from the problem of approximately counting list homomorphisms --- whereas for exact counting all three of these problems are interreducible. We also show that the number of retractions is at least as hard to approximate as both the number of surjective homomorphisms and the number of compactions. In contrast, exactly counting compactions is the hardest of all of these exact counting problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Using a min-cut generalisation to go beyond Boolean surjective VCSPs

In this work, we first study a natural generalisation of the Min-Cut problem, where a graph is augmented by a superadditive set function defined on its vertex subsets. The goal is to select a vertex subset such that the weight of the induced cut plus the set function value are minimised. In addition, a lower and upper bound is imposed on the solution size. We present a polynomial-time algorithm for enumerating all near-optimal solutions of this Bounded Generalised Min-Cut problem. Second, we apply this novel algorithm to surjective general-valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs), i.e., VCSPs in which each label has to be used at least once. On the Boolean domain, Fulla, Uppman, and Zivny [ACM ToCT'18] have recently established a complete classification of surjective VCSPs based on an unbounded version of the Generalised Min-Cut problem. Their result features the discovery of a new non-trivial tractable case called EDS that does not appear in the non-surjective setting. As our main result, we extend the class EDS to arbitrary finite domains and provide a conditional complexity classification for surjective VCSPs of this type based on a reduction to smaller domains. On three-element domains, this leads to a complete classification of such VCSPs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Sparsification of Binary CSPs

A cut $\varepsilon$-sparsifier of a weighted graph $G$ is a re-weighted subgraph of $G$ of (quasi)linear size that preserves the size of all cuts up to a multiplicative factor of $\varepsilon$. Since their introduction by Benczúr and Karger [STOC'96], cut sparsifiers have proved extremely influential and found various applications. Going beyond cut sparsifiers, Filtser and Krauthgamer [SIDMA'17] gave a precise classification of which binary Boolean CSPs are sparsifiable. In this paper, we extend their result to binary CSPs on arbitrary finite domains.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

The complexity of Boolean surjective general-valued CSPs

Valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs) are discrete optimisation problems with a $(\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\})$-valued objective function given as a sum of fixed-arity functions. In Boolean surjective VCSPs, variables take on labels from $D=\{0,1\}$ and an optimal assignment is required to use both labels from $D$. Examples include the classical global Min-Cut problem in graphs and the Minimum Distance problem studied in coding theory. We establish a dichotomy theorem and thus give a complete complexity classification of Boolean surjective VCSPs with respect to exact solvability. Our work generalises the dichotomy for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued constraint languages (corresponding to surjective decision CSPs) obtained by Creignou and Hébrard. For the maximisation problem of $\mathbb{Q}_{\geq 0}$-valued surjective VCSPs, we also establish a dichotomy theorem with respect to approximability. Unlike in the case of Boolean surjective (decision) CSPs, there appears a novel tractable class of languages that is trivial in the non-surjective setting. This newly discovered tractable class has an interesting mathematical structure related to downsets and upsets. Our main contribution is identifying this class and proving that it lies on the borderline of tractability. A crucial part of our proof is a polynomial-time algorithm for enumerating all near-optimal solutions to a generalised Min-Cut problem, which might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The complexity of finite-valued CSPs

We study the computational complexity of exact minimisation of rational-valued discrete functions. Let $Γ$ be a set of rational-valued functions on a fixed finite domain; such a set is called a finite-valued constraint language. The valued constraint satisfaction problem, $\operatorname{VCSP}(Γ)$, is the problem of minimising a function given as a sum of functions from $Γ$. We establish a dichotomy theorem with respect to exact solvability for all finite-valued constraint languages defined on domains of arbitrary finite size. We show that every constraint language $Γ$ either admits a binary symmetric fractional polymorphism in which case the basic linear programming relaxation solves any instance of $\operatorname{VCSP}(Γ)$ exactly, or $Γ$ satisfies a simple hardness condition that allows for a polynomial-time reduction from Max-Cut to $\operatorname{VCSP}(Γ)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Galois Connection for Weighted (Relational) Clones of Infinite Size

A Galois connection between clones and relational clones on a fixed finite domain is one of the cornerstones of the so-called algebraic approach to the computational complexity of non-uniform Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). Cohen et al. established a Galois connection between finitely-generated weighted clones and finitely-generated weighted relational clones [SICOMP'13], and asked whether this connection holds in general. We answer this question in the affirmative for weighted (relational) clones with real weights and show that the complexity of the corresponding valued CSPs is preserved.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Maximizing k-Submodular Functions and Beyond

We consider the maximization problem in the value oracle model of functions defined on $k$-tuples of sets that are submodular in every orthant and $r$-wise monotone, where $k\geq 2$ and $1\leq r\leq k$. We give an analysis of a deterministic greedy algorithm that shows that any such function can be approximated to a factor of $1/(1+r)$. For $r=k$, we give an analysis of a randomised greedy algorithm that shows that any such function can be approximated to a factor of $1/(1+\sqrt{k/2})$. In the case of $k=r=2$, the considered functions correspond precisely to bisubmodular functions, in which case we obtain an approximation guarantee of $1/2$. We show that, as in the case of submodular functions, this result is the best possible in both the value query model, and under the assumption that $NP\neq RP$. Extending a result of Ando et al., we show that for any $k\geq 3$ submodularity in every orthant and pairwise monotonicity (i.e. $r=2$) precisely characterize $k$-submodular functions. Consequently, we obtain an approximation guarantee of $1/3$ (and thus independent of $k$) for the maximization problem of $k$-submodular functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Necessary conditions for tractability of valued CSPs

The connection between constraint languages and clone theory has been a fruitful line of research on the complexity of constraint satisfaction problems. In a recent result, Cohen et al. [SICOMP'13] have characterised a Galois connection between valued constraint languages and so-called weighted clones. In this paper, we study the structure of weighted clones. We extend the results of Creed and Zivny from [CP'11/SICOMP'13] on types of weightings necessarily contained in every nontrivial weighted clone. This result has immediate computational complexity consequences as it provides necessary conditions for tractability of weighted clones and thus valued constraint languages. We demonstrate that some of the necessary conditions are also sufficient for tractability, while others are provably not.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Sherali-Adams relaxations for valued CSPs

We consider Sherali-Adams linear programming relaxations for solving valued constraint satisfaction problems to optimality. The utility of linear programming relaxations in this context have previously been demonstrated using the lowest possible level of this hierarchy under the name of the basic linear programming relaxation (BLP). It has been shown that valued constraint languages containing only finite-valued weighted relations are tractable if, and only if, the integrality gap of the BLP is 1. In this paper, we demonstrate that almost all of the known tractable languages with arbitrary weighted relations have an integrality gap 1 for the Sherali-Adams relaxation with parameters (2,3). The result is closely connected to the notion of bounded relational width for the ordinary constraint satisfaction problem and its recent characterisation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Variable and value elimination in binary constraint satisfaction via forbidden patterns

Variable or value elimination in a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) can be used in preprocessing or during search to reduce search space size. A variable elimination rule (value elimination rule) allows the polynomial-time identification of certain variables (domain elements) whose elimination, without the introduction of extra compensatory constraints, does not affect the satisfiability of an instance. We show that there are essentially just four variable elimination rules and three value elimination rules defined by forbidding generic sub-instances, known as irreducible existential patterns, in arc-consistent CSP instances. One of the variable elimination rules is the already-known Broken Triangle Property, whereas the other three are novel. The three value elimination rules can all be seen as strict generalisations of neighbourhood substitution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The power of linear programming for general-valued CSPs

Let $D$, called the domain, be a fixed finite set and let $Γ$, called the valued constraint language, be a fixed set of functions of the form $f:D^m\to\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\}$, where different functions might have different arity $m$. We study the valued constraint satisfaction problem parametrised by $Γ$, denoted by VCSP$(Γ)$. These are minimisation problems given by $n$ variables and the objective function given by a sum of functions from $Γ$, each depending on a subset of the $n$ variables. Finite-valued constraint languages contain functions that take on only rational values and not infinite values. Our main result is a precise algebraic characterisation of valued constraint languages whose instances can be solved exactly by the basic linear programming relaxation (BLP). For a valued constraint language $Γ$, BLP is a decision procedure for $Γ$ if and only if $Γ$ admits a symmetric fractional polymorphism of every arity. For a finite-valued constraint language $Γ$, BLP is a decision procedure if and only if $Γ$ admits a symmetric fractional polymorphism of some arity, or equivalently, if $Γ$ admits a symmetric fractional polymorphism of arity 2. Using these results, we obtain tractability of several novel classes of problems, including problems over valued constraint languages that are: (1) submodular on arbitrary lattices; (2) $k$-submodular on arbitrary finite domains; (3) weakly (and hence strongly) tree-submodular on arbitrary trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

An Algebraic Theory of Complexity for Discrete Optimisation

Discrete optimisation problems arise in many different areas and are studied under many different names. In many such problems the quantity to be optimised can be expressed as a sum of functions of a restricted form. Here we present a unifying theory of complexity for problems of this kind. We show that the complexity of a finite-domain discrete optimisation problem is determined by certain algebraic properties of the objective function, which we call weighted polymorphisms. We define a Galois connection between sets of rational-valued functions and sets of weighted polymorphisms and show how the closed sets of this Galois connection can be characterised. These results provide a new approach to studying the complexity of discrete optimisation. We use this approach to identify certain maximal tractable subproblems of the general problem, and hence derive a complete classification of complexity for the Boolean case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Power of Linear Programming for Valued CSPs

A class of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs) is characterised by a valued constraint language, a fixed set of cost functions on a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from the language with the goal to minimise the sum. This framework includes and generalises well-studied constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and maximum constraint satisfaction problems (Max-CSPs). Our main result is a precise algebraic characterisation of valued constraint languages whose instances can be solved exactly by the basic linear programming relaxation. Using this result, we obtain tractability of several novel and previously widely-open classes of VCSPs, including problems over valued constraint languages that are: (1) submodular on arbitrary lattices; (2) bisubmodular (also known as k-submodular) on arbitrary finite domains; (3) weakly (and hence strongly) tree-submodular on arbitrary trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The complexity of conservative valued CSPs

We study the complexity of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSP). A problem from VCSP is characterised by a \emph{constraint language}, a fixed set of cost functions over a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from the language and the goal is to minimise the sum. We consider the case of languages containing all possible unary cost functions. In the case of languages consisting of only $\{0,\infty\}$-valued cost functions (i.e. relations), such languages have been called \emph{conservative} and studied by Bulatov [LICS'03] and recently by Barto [LICS'11]. Since we study valued languages, we call a language conservative if it contains all finite-valued unary cost functions. The complexity of conservative valued languages has been studied by Cohen et al. [AIJ'06] for languages over Boolean domains, by Deineko et al. [JACM'08] for $\{0,1\}$-valued languages (a.k.a Max-CSP), and by Takhanov [STACS'10] for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued languages containing all finite-valued unary cost functions (a.k.a. Min-Cost-Hom). We prove a Schaefer-like dichotomy theorem for conservative valued languages: if all cost functions in the language satisfy a certain condition (specified by a complementary combination of \emph{STP and MJN multimorphisms}), then any instance can be solved in polytime (via a new algorithm developed in this paper), otherwise the language is NP-hard. This is the \emph{first} complete complexity classification of \emph{general-valued constraint languages} over non-Boolean domains. This generalises previous results by Takhanov [STACS'10] and (a subset of results) by Cohen et al. [AIJ'06] and Deineko et al. [JACM'08]. Moreover, our results do not rely on any computer-assisted search as in Deineko et al. [JACM'08], and provide a powerful tool for proving hardness of finite- and general-valued languages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Generalising tractable VCSPs defined by symmetric tournament pair multimorphisms

We study optimisation problems that can be formulated as valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSP). A problem from VCSP is characterised by a \emph{constraint language}, a fixed set of cost functions taking finite and infinite costs over a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from the language and the goal is to minimise the sum. We are interested in \emph{tractable} constraint languages; that is, languages that give rise to VCSP instances solvable in polynomial time. Cohen et al. (AIJ'06) have shown that constraint languages that admit the MJN multimorphism are tractable. Moreover, using a minimisation algorithm for submodular functions, Cohen et al. (TCS'08) have shown that constraint languages that admit an STP (symmetric tournament pair) multimorphism are tractable. We generalise these results by showing that languages admitting the MJN multimorphism on a subdomain and an STP multimorphisms on the complement of the subdomain are tractable. The algorithm is a reduction to the algorithm for languages admitting an STP multimorphism.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Hybrid tractability of soft constraint problems

The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is a central generic problem in computer science and artificial intelligence: it provides a common framework for many theoretical problems as well as for many real-life applications. Soft constraint problems are a generalisation of the CSP which allow the user to model optimisation problems. Considerable effort has been made in identifying properties which ensure tractability in such problems. In this work, we initiate the study of hybrid tractability of soft constraint problems; that is, properties which guarantee tractability of the given soft constraint problem, but which do not depend only on the underlying structure of the instance (such as being tree-structured) or only on the types of soft constraints in the instance (such as submodularity). We present several novel hybrid classes of soft constraint problems, which include a machine scheduling problem, constraint problems of arbitrary arities with no overlapping nogoods, and the SoftAllDiff constraint with arbitrary unary soft constraints. An important tool in our investigation will be the notion of forbidden substructures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The complexity of conservative finite-valued CSPs

We study the complexity of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSP). A problem from VCSP is characterised by a \emph{constraint language}, a fixed set of cost functions over a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from the language and the goal is to minimise the sum. We consider the case of so-called \emph{conservative} languages; that is, languages containing all unary cost functions, thus allowing arbitrary restrictions on the domains of the variables. This problem has been studied by Bulatov [LICS'03] for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued languages (i.e. CSP), by Cohen~\etal\ (AIJ'06) for Boolean domains, by Deineko et al. (JACM'08) for $\{0,1\}$-valued cost functions (i.e. Max-CSP), and by Takhanov (STACS'10) for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued languages containing all finite-valued unary cost functions (i.e. Min-Cost-Hom). We give an elementary proof of a complete complexity classification of conservative finite-valued languages: we show that every conservative finite-valued language is either tractable or NP-hard. This is the \emph{first} dichotomy result for finite-valued VCSPs over non-Boolean domains.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access