Paper detail

The CASTOR calorimeter at the CMS experiment

The CASTOR Calorimeter at the CMS experiment is an electromagnetic/hadronic calorimeter which covers the very forward region of the detector (-6.6 < eta < -5.2). CASTOR is a Cherenkov sampling calorimeter, consisting of quartz and tungsten plates, with an overall depth of 10 interaction lengths, able to detect penetrating cascade particles. It is segmented in 16 transversal and 14 longitudinal sections. Surrounding the beam pipe, its design is determined by space constraints and restricted to materials which tolerate a high radiation level. In this presentation we report on the operational experience and measurements with the CASTOR calorimeter during the 2010 data taking at the LHC, with proton-proton and heavy ion collisions. An overview of the broad physics program which can be accessed with CASTOR, as well as the status of published and ongoing physics analyses and detector studies are presented.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.