Paper detail

The calculus of thermodynamical formalism

Given a finite-to-one map acting on a compact metric space, one classically constructs for each potential in an appropriate Banach space of functionsa transfer operator acting on functions. Under suitable condition, the Ruelle-Perron-Frobenius enable to define for each potential an invariant measure called the Gibbs measure. The set of potential giving birth to the same Gibbs measure is a linear subspace containing one distinguished potential, said to be normalized.The goal of the present article is to study the geometry of the set of normalized potentials, of the normalization map, and of the Gibbs map sending potentials to Gibbs measures. We give an easy proof of the fact that the set of normalized potentials is an analytic submanifold and that the normalization map is analytic; we compute the derivative of the Gibbs map; last we endow the set of normalized potential with a natural weakRiemannian metric (derived from the asymptotic variance) with respect to which we compute the gradient flow induced by the pressure with respect to a given potential, e.g. the metric entropy functional.We also apply these ideas to recover in a wide setting existence and uniqueness of equilibrium states, possibly under constraints.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.