Paper detail

The bivariate current status model

For the univariate current status and, more generally, the interval censoring model, distribution theory has been developed for the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and smoothed maximum likelihood estimator (SMLE) of the unknown distribution function, see, e.g., [12], [7], [4], [5], [6], [10], [11] and [8]. For the bivariate current status and interval censoring models distribution theory of this type is still absent and even the rate at which we can expect reasonable estimators to converge is unknown. We define a purely discrete plug-in estimator of the distribution function which locally converges at rate n^{1/3} and derive its (normal) limit distribution. Unlike the MLE or SMLE, this estimator is not a proper distribution function. Since the estimator is purely discrete, it demonstrates that the n^{1/3} convergence rate is in principle possible for the MLE, but whether this actually holds for the MLE is still an open problem. If the cube root n rate holds for the MLE, this would mean that the local 1-dimensional rate of the MLE continues to hold in dimension 2, a (perhaps) somewhat surprising result. The simulation results do not seem to be in contradiction with this assumption, however. We compare the behavior of the plug-in estimator with the behavior of the MLE on a sieve and the SMLE in a simulation study. This indicates that the plug-in estimator and the SMLE have a smaller variance but a larger bias than the sieved MLE. The SMLE is conjectured to have a n^{1/3}-rate of convergence if we use bandwidths of order n^{-1/6}. We derive its (normal) limit distribution, using this assumption. Finally, we demonstrate the behavior of the MLE and SMLE for the bivariate interval censored data of [1], which have been discussed by many authors, see e.g., [18], [3], [2] and [15].

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.