Paper detail

The background from single electromagnetic subcascades for a stereo system of air Cherenkov telescopes

The MAGIC experiment, a very large Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescope (IACT) with sensitivity to low energy (E < 100 GeV) VHE gamma rays, has been operated since 2004. It has been found that the gamma/hadron separation in IACTs becomes much more difficult below 100 GeV [Albert et al 2008] A system of two large telescopes may eventually be triggered by hadronic events containing Cherenkov light from only one electromagnetic subcascade or two gamma subcascades, which are products of the single pi^0 decay. This is a possible reason for the deterioration of the experiment's sensitivity below 100 GeV. In this paper a system of two MAGIC telescopes working in stereoscopic mode is studied using Monte Carlo simulations. The detected images have similar shapes to that of primary gamma-rays and they have small sizes (mainly below 400 photoelectrons (p.e.)) which correspond to an energy of primary gamma-rays below 100 GeV. The background from single or two electromagnetic subcascdes is concentrated at energies below 200 GeV. Finally the number of background events is compared to the number of VHE gamma-ray excess events from the Crab Nebula. The investigated background survives simple cuts for sizes below 250 p.e. and thus the experiment's sensitivity deteriorates at lower energies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.