Paper detail

The amount of crustal entrainment and the type of Vela-like pulsars

The "glitch crisis" of Vela-like pulsars has been a great debate recently. It might challenge the standard two-component glitch model, because large fractions of superfluid neutrons are thought to be entrained in the lattices of the crust part, then there is not enough superfluid neutrons to trigger the large glitches in Vela-like pulsars. But the amount of entrainment which could effectively constrain the fractional moment of inertia of a pulsar, is very uncertain. In order to examine the importance of this parameter on the inner structures of neutron stars, we relax the "glitch crisis" argument, employ a set of most developed equations of state derived within microscopic many-body approaches that could fulfill the recent 2-solar-mass constraint, and evaluate their predictions for the fractional moment of inertia with two extremes of crustal entrainment. We find a final determination of the amount of entrainment could be closely related to the type of neutron star. If a large enough fraction of neutrons are entrained, a Vela-like pulsar could not be a hybrid star, namely no free quarks would be present in its core. In addition, we use the Vela data to narrow the parameter space of hyperon-meson couplings in the popular phenomenological relativistic mean field model.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.