Paper detail

The Accuracy of Tree-based Counting in Dynamic Networks

Tree-based protocols are ubiquitous in distributed systems. They are flexible, they perform generally well, and, in static conditions, their analysis is mostly simple. Under churn, however, node joins and failures can have complex global effects on the tree overlays, making analysis surprisingly subtle. To our knowledge, few prior analytic results for performance estimation of tree based protocols under churn are currently known. We study a simple Bellman-Ford-like protocol which performs network size estimation over a tree-shaped overlay. A continuous time Markov model is constructed which allows key protocol characteristics to be estimated, including the expected number of nodes at a given (perceived) distance to the root and, for each such node, the expected (perceived) size of the subnetwork rooted at that node. We validate the model by simulation, using a range of network sizes, node degrees, and churn-to-protocol rates, with convincing results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.