Paper detail

Text-based depression detection on sparse data

Previous text-based depression detection is commonly based on large user-generated data. Sparse scenarios like clinical conversations are less investigated. This work proposes a text-based multi-task BGRU network with pretrained word embeddings to model patients' responses during clinical interviews. Our main approach uses a novel multi-task loss function, aiming at modeling both depression severity and binary health state. We independently investigate word- and sentence-level word-embeddings as well as the use of large-data pretraining for depression detection. To strengthen our findings, we report mean-averaged results for a multitude of independent runs on sparse data. First, we show that pretraining is helpful for word-level text-based depression detection. Second, our results demonstrate that sentence-level word-embeddings should be mostly preferred over word-level ones. While the choice of pooling function is less crucial, mean and attention pooling should be preferred over last-timestep pooling. Our method outputs depression presence results as well as predicted severity score, culminating a macro F1 score of 0.84 and MAE of 3.48 on the DAIC-WOZ development set.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.