Paper detail

Tetraquark interpretation of the BELLE data on the anomalous $Υ(1S) π^+π^-$ and $Υ(2S) π^+π^-$ production near the $Υ(5S)$ resonance

We analyze the Belle data [K. F. Chen {\it et al.} (Belle Collaboration), Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 100}, 112001 (2008); I. Adachi {\it et al.} (Belle Collaboration), arXiv:0808.2445] on the processes $e^+ e^- \to Υ(1S)\; π^+π^-, Υ(2S)\; π^+π^-$ near the peak of the $Υ(5S)$ resonance, which are found to be anomalously large in rates compared to similar dipion transitions between the lower $Υ$ resonances. Assuming these final states arise from the production and decays of the $J^{PC}=1^{--}$ state $Y_b(10890)$, which we interpret as a bound (diquark-antidiquark) tetraquark state $[bq][\bar{b}\bar{q}]$, a dynamical model for the decays $Y_b \to Υ(1S)\; π^+π^-, Υ(2S)\; π^+π^-$ is presented. Depending on the phase space, these decays receive significant contributions from the scalar $0^{++}$ states, $f_0(600)$ and $f_0(980)$, and from the $2^{++}$ $q\bar{q}$-meson $f_2(1270)$. Our model provides excellent fits for the decay distributions, supporting $Y_b$ as a tetraquark state.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.