Paper detail

Tests of Linear Hypotheses using Indirect Information

In multigroup data settings with small within-group sample sizes, standard $F$-tests of group-specific linear hypotheses can have low power, particularly if the within-group sample sizes are not large relative to the number of explanatory variables. To remedy this situation, in this article we derive alternative test statistics based on information-sharing across groups. Each group-specific test has potentially much larger power than the standard $F$-test, while still exactly maintaining a target type I error rate if the hypothesis for the group is true. The proposed test for a given group uses a statistic that has optimal marginal power under a prior distribution derived from the data of the other groups. This statistic approaches the usual $F$-statistic as the prior distribution becomes more diffuse, but approaches a limiting "cone" test statistic as the prior distribution becomes extremely concentrated. We compare the power and $p$-values of the cone test to that of the $F$-test in some high-dimensional asymptotic scenarios. An analysis of educational outcome data is provided, demonstrating empirically that the proposed test is more powerful than the $F$-test.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.