Paper detail

Testing the weak equivalence principle with the binary neutron star merger GW170817: the gravitational contribution of the host galaxy

The successful detection of the binary neutron star (BNS) merger GW170817 and its electromagnetic (EM) counterparts has provided an opportunity to explore the joint effect of the host galaxy and the Milky Way (MW) on the weak equivalence principle (WEP) test. In this paper, using the Navarro$-$Frenk$-$White (NFW) profile and the Herquist profile, we present an analytic model to calculate the galactic potential, in which the possible locations of the source by the observed angle offset and the second supernova (SN2) kick are accounted for. We show that the upper limit of $Δγ$ is $10^{-9}$ for the comparison between GW170817 and a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A), and it is $10^{-4}$ for the comparison between GW170817 and a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo). These limits are more stringent by one to two orders of magnitude than those determined solely by the measured MW potential in the literature. We demonstrate that the WEP test is strengthened by contribution from the host galaxy to the Shapiro time delay. Meanwhile, we also find that large natal kicks produce a maximum deviation of about $20\%$ to the results with a typical kick velocity 400$\sim$ 500 km s$^{-1}$. Finally, we analyze the impact from the halo mass of NGC 4993 with a typical 0.2 dex uncertainty, and find that the upper limit of $Δγ$, with a maximum mass $10^{12.4}h^{-1} M_{\odot}$, is nearly two times more stringent than that of the minimum mass $10^{12.0}h^{-1} M_{\odot}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.