Paper detail

Testing the validity of random-singlet state for long-range hopping models through the scaling of entanglement entropy

We consider a sublattice-symmetric free-fermion model on a one-dimensional lattice with random hopping amplitudes decaying with the distance as $|t_l|\sim l^{-α}$, and address the question how far an analogue of the random-singlet state (RSS) conceived originally for describing the ground state of certain random spin chains is valid for this model. For this purpose, we study the effective central charge characterizing the logarithmic divergence of the entanglement entropy (EE) and the prefactor of the distribution of distances between localization centers on the two sublattices, which must fulfill a consistency relation for a RSS. For $α>1$, we find by exact diagonalization an overall logarithmic divergence of the entanglement entropy with an effective central charge varying with $α$. The large $α$ limit of the effective central charge is found to be different from that of the nearest-neighbor hopping model. The consistency relation of RSS is violated for $α\le 2$, while for $α>2$ it is possibly valid, but this conclusion is hampered by a crossover induced by the short-range fixed point. The EE is also calculated by the strong-disorder renormalization group (SDRG) method numerically. Besides the traditional scheme, we construct and apply a more efficient minimal SDRG scheme having a linear (nearest-neighbor) structure, which turns out to be an accurate approximation of the full SDRG scheme for not too small $α$. The SDRG method is found to provide systematically lower effective central charges than exact diagonalization does, nevertheless it becomes more and more accurate for increasing $α$. Furthermore, as opposed to nearest-neighbor models, it indicates a weak dependence on the disorder distribution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.