Paper detail

Testing the star formation scaling relations in the clumps of the North American and Pelican cloud complexes

The processes which regulate the star-formation within molecular clouds are still not well understood. Various star-formation scaling relations have been proposed to explain this issue by formulating a relation between star-formation rate surface density ($\rm Σ_{SFR}$) and the underlying gas surface density ($\rm Σ_{gas}$). In this work, we test various star formation scaling relations, such as Kennicutt-Schmidt relation, volumetric star-formation relation, orbital time model, crossing time model, and multi free-fall time scale model towards the North American and Pelican Nebulae complexes and in cold clumps associated with them. Measuring stellar-mass from young stellar objects and gaseous mass from CO measurements, we estimated mean $\rm Σ_{SFR}$, star formation rate per free-fall time, and star formation efficiency (SFE) for clumps to be 1.5 $\rm M{_\odot}~yr^{-1}~kpc^{-2}$, 0.009, 2.0$\%$, respectively, while for the entire NAN complex the values are 0.6 $\rm M{_\odot}~yr^{-1}~kpc^{-2}$, 0.0003, and 1.6$\%$, respectively. For clumps, we notice that the observed properties are in line with the correlation obtained between $\rm Σ_{SFR}$ and $\rm Σ_{gas}$, and between $\rm Σ_{SFR}$ and $\rm Σ_{gas}$ per free-fall time and orbital time for Galactic clouds. At the same time, we do not observe any correlation with $\rm Σ_{gas}$ per crossing time and multi free-fall time. Even though we see correlations in former cases, however, all models agree with each other within a factor of 0.5 dex, and discriminating between these models is not possible due to the current uncertainties in the input observables. We also test the variation of $\rm Σ_{SFR}$ versus the dense gas, but due to low statistics, a weak correlation is seen in our analysis.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.