Researcher profile

Swagat R. Das

Swagat R. Das contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Tracers of Dense Gas in the Outer Galaxy

We have mapped HCN and HCO$^{+}$ (J = 1 $\to$ 0) line emission toward a sample of seven star-forming regions (with 12 + log[O/H] range from 8.34 to 8.69) in the outer Milky Way (Galactocentric distance > 9.5 kpc), using the 14-meter radio telescope of the Taeduk Radio Astronomy Observatory (TRAO). We compare these two molecular lines with other conventional tracers of dense gas, millimeter-wave continuum emission from dust and extinction thresholds ($A_{V} \geq 8$ mag), inferred from the $^{13}$CO line data. HCN and HCO$^{+}$ correlate better with the millimeter emission than with the extinction criterion. A significant amount of luminosity comes from regions below the extinction criterion and outside the millimeter clump for all the clouds. The average fraction of HCN luminosity from within the regions with $A_{V} \geq 8$ mag is $0.343\pm0.225$; for the regions of millimeter emission, it is $0.478\pm0.149$. Based on a comparison with column density maps from Herschel, HCN and HCO$^{+}$ trace dense gas in high column density regions better than does $^{13}$CO. HCO$^{+}$ is less concentrated than HCN for outer Galaxy targets, in contrast with the inner Galaxy sample, suggesting that metallicity may affect the interpretation of tracers of dense gas. The conversion factor between the dense gas mass ($M_{dense}$) and line luminosities of HCN and HCO$^{+}$, when integrated over the whole cloud, is comparable with factors used in extragalactic studies.

preprint2021arXiv

Testing the star formation scaling relations in the clumps of the North American and Pelican cloud complexes

The processes which regulate the star-formation within molecular clouds are still not well understood. Various star-formation scaling relations have been proposed to explain this issue by formulating a relation between star-formation rate surface density ($\rm Σ_{SFR}$) and the underlying gas surface density ($\rm Σ_{gas}$). In this work, we test various star formation scaling relations, such as Kennicutt-Schmidt relation, volumetric star-formation relation, orbital time model, crossing time model, and multi free-fall time scale model towards the North American and Pelican Nebulae complexes and in cold clumps associated with them. Measuring stellar-mass from young stellar objects and gaseous mass from CO measurements, we estimated mean $\rm Σ_{SFR}$, star formation rate per free-fall time, and star formation efficiency (SFE) for clumps to be 1.5 $\rm M{_\odot}~yr^{-1}~kpc^{-2}$, 0.009, 2.0$\%$, respectively, while for the entire NAN complex the values are 0.6 $\rm M{_\odot}~yr^{-1}~kpc^{-2}$, 0.0003, and 1.6$\%$, respectively. For clumps, we notice that the observed properties are in line with the correlation obtained between $\rm Σ_{SFR}$ and $\rm Σ_{gas}$, and between $\rm Σ_{SFR}$ and $\rm Σ_{gas}$ per free-fall time and orbital time for Galactic clouds. At the same time, we do not observe any correlation with $\rm Σ_{gas}$ per crossing time and multi free-fall time. Even though we see correlations in former cases, however, all models agree with each other within a factor of 0.5 dex, and discriminating between these models is not possible due to the current uncertainties in the input observables. We also test the variation of $\rm Σ_{SFR}$ versus the dense gas, but due to low statistics, a weak correlation is seen in our analysis.