Paper detail

Testing Independence of Bivariate Censored Data using Random Walk on Restricted Permutation Graph

In this paper, we propose a procedure to test the independence of bivariate censored data, which is generic and applicable to any censoring types in the literature. To test the hypothesis, we consider a rank-based statistic, Kendall's tau statistic. The censored data defines a restricted permutation space of all possible ranks of the observations. We propose the statistic, the average of Kendall's tau over the ranks in the restricted permutation space. To evaluate the statistic and its reference distribution, we develop a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure to obtain uniform samples on the restricted permutation space and numerically approximate the null distribution of the averaged Kendall's tau. We apply the procedure to three real data examples with different censoring types, and compare the results with those by existing methods. We conclude the paper with some additional discussions not given in the main body of the paper.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.