Paper detail

Testing $CP$ in the Bjorken process

In a more general electroweak theory, there could be Higgs particles that are odd under $CP$, and also Higgs-like particles which are not eigenstates of $CP$. We discuss distributions which for the Bjorken process are sensitive to the $CP$ parity. Correlations among momenta of the initial electron and final-state fermions yield this kind of information. We discuss also observables which may demonstrate presence of $CP$ violation and identify a phase shift $δ$ which is a measure of the strength of $CP$ violation in the Higgs-vector-vector coupling, and which can be measured directly in the decay distribution. We present Monte Carlo data on the expected efficiency, and conclude that it is relatively easy to determine whether the produced particle is even or odd under $CP$. However, observation of any $CP$ violation would require a very large amount of data.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.