Paper detail

Testing backreaction effects with type Ia supernova data and observational Hubble parameter data

The backreaction term ${\cal Q}_\CD$ and the averaged spatial Ricci scalar $\average{\CR}$ in the spatially averaged inhomogeneous Universe can be used to combine into effective perfect fluid energy density $\varrho_{\rm eff}^{\CD}$ and pressure $p_{\rm eff}^{\CD}$ that can be regarded as new effective sources for the backreaction effects. In order to model the realistic evolution of backreaction, we adopt the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder(CPL) parameterizations of the equation of state(EoS) of the effective perfect fluid. To deal with observations in the backreaction context, in this paper, we employ two metrics to describe the the late time Universe, one of them is the standard Friedmann-Lema\^ıtre-Robertson-Walker(FLRW) metric, and the other is a template metric with an evolving curvature parameter introduced by Larena et. al. in \cite{larena2009testing}. We also fit the CPL backreaction model using type Ia supernova(SN Ia) data and observational Hubble parameter data(OHD) with these two metrics, and find out that parameter tensions between two different data sets are larger when the backreaction model is equipped with the template metric, therefore we conclude that the prescription of the geometrical instantaneous spatially-constant curvature $κ_{\CD}$ needs to be modified.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.